Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Shain

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1896No. 16006PublishedCited by 71 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, amending a minute order and setting aside a judgment. Wm. T. Wallace, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

An amended complaint was filed in this action May 16, 1890, to which a demurrer was filed by the defendants, Herrlich and Hanlon, May 23d, and by the defendant Davis, June 4th. October 10, 1890, the demurrer of Herrlich and Hanlon came on for argument, and was sustained by the court, and thereupon the clerk made the following entry in his minutes under the title of the cause: “In this case the demurrer of the defendants, Julie Herrlich and John F. Hanlon, to the second amended complaint coming on regularly this day to be heard, it is by the court ordered, on motion of counsel for said…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Weed v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API