Legal Opinion

People v. Ward

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1903No. Crim. No. 958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

MOTION for an order directing the clerk of the Superior Court forthwith to print a transcript upon appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. F. H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion in this case, and in the case of Ward v. Dunne, 136 Cal. 19.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a motion for an order directing the clerk of the superior court to forthwith print a transcript of the record on appeal from the judgment in said cause. The motion is resisted upon the ground that there is no appeal pending. The facts out of which the controversy arises are fully set forth in the case of Ward v. Dunne, 136 Cal. 19, and upon those facts the motion must he denied. If any judgment has ever been rendered against the defendant it was rendered on the 2d of December, 1899. Nothing was done on November 19, 1901, except to direct the entry nunc pro tuno of a judgment which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. BirdsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API