Ward v. Dunne
California Supreme Court
MANDAMUS to a Judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are Stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
Mandamus to compel the settlement of a hill of exceptions.
From the return to our alternative writ, and the facts stated and agreed to at the hearing, the case may be stated as follows: On the 2d of December, 1899, a judgment was pronounced against the petitioner, convicting him of felony embezzlement and sentencing him to the state prison at Folsom. From that judgment he appealed to this court, and the transcript of the record filed here contained a copy of a judgment in due form, which was by this court affirmed. Upon the going down of the remittitur to the superior court, it was there…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. LenonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.