Legal Opinion

Feland v. B.V.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2006No. 20050300PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] B.V. appealed a district court order finding B.V. is a sexually dangerous individual as defined in N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(8) and committing B.V. to the care, custody, and control of the Executive Director of the Department of Human Services until the Executive Director determines B.V. is safe to be at large and has received the maximum benefit of treatment. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On October 27, 2004, the Burleigh County State’s Attorney’s Office filed a Petition for Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3, seeking to commit B.V. as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Grosinger v. M.B.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Interest of JBNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bertsch v. D.V.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Whelan v. A.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Wamstad v. LoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API