Legal Opinion

Whelan v. A.O.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2011No. 20100219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] A.O. appeals from the trial court’s order finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual and continuing his civil commitment to the care, custody, and control of the executive director of the Department of Human Services. On appeal, A.O. argues the trial court must consider the treatment he was receiving at the North Dakota State Hospital and erred in finding it was the least restrictive treatment available to him. We conclude the trial court made detailed findings and the court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Olson v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Overboe v. Farm Credit Services of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Griffin v. Loring Reil Sky RushNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. KleppeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Binder v. WhitetailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Interest of D.J.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API