Legal Opinion

Interest of Corman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2014No. 20130274PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ray Corman appeals from a district court memorandum decision and order concluding Corman is a sexually dangerous individual and committing him to the care, custody and control of the executive director of the North Dakota Department of Human Services. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In December 1986, Corman pled guilty to felony battery in Indiana and was sentenced to five years incarceration, all suspended, and three years supervised probation. One month later, Corman was charged in Indiana with sexually molesting a ten-year-old boy during October 1986, when Corman was 27 years old.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State of Iowa v. Ricky Lee PutmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HollingsheadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Grosinger v. ThillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API