Legal Opinion
Calfarm Ins. Co. v. Wolf
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 2001No. C033885PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
Insurance Code section 11580.2 (section 11580.2), in part, governs insurance companies in providing uninsured motorist coverage (UMC). Subdivision (c)(2) of section 11580.2 authorizes an insurer to exclude UMC for bodily injury of its insured if the insured is in, upon, entering into, or alighting from, a motor vehicle that is not described in the insured’s auto policy and the owner of that vehicle “has insurance similar to that provided in this section.”
We conclude that where the insured has $100,000 in UMC and the owner of the nondescribed vehicle has $30,000 in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Grunfeld v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Darrah v. California State Automobile Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kirby v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- California Fair Plan Ass'n v. GarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mercury Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- KAUFMAN & BROAD v. Performance PlasteringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Allstate Insurance v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.