Legal Opinion
Kirby v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1965No. Civ. 28129PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring in effect that plaintiffs take nothing under certain policies of insurance.
Plaintiffs brought an action in declaratory relief to have determined their rights under certain insurance policies issued by defendant. An agreed statement of facts was submitted by the parties and the court made findings of fact 1 substantially in accordance with such agreed statement of facts.
The court concluded as a matter of law that plaintiffs had no coverage under the defendant’s policies issued to the Kirbys and plaintiffs were not entitled to recover anything from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Burcham v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Hendricks v. Meritplan InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- The Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford, Connecticut v. Mildred Yancey Wells, of the Estate of Willie Wells, Deceased, and Mildred Yancey WellsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. SiddonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Pecker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.