Mid-Century Insurance v. Gardner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
Plaintiff Mid-Century Insurance Company brought this action for a declaration that it had no duty to pay benefits to its insured, defendant Ron Gardner, for personal injuries he sustained in an accident with an uninsured driver. It claimed the policy Mr. Gardner had purchased offered no coverage. The parties stipulated to a trial before a temporary judge, who ruled in the plaintiff insurer’s favor and entered judgment accordingly. With respect to the explicit basis for the ruling, Mr. Gardner asserts the temporary judge improperly disregarded the corporate form of his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Cal-State Business Products & Services, Inc. v. RicohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.