Legal Opinion

In re Belardi

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2006No. 01-BG-222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This original disciplinary matter involves a recommendation for a one-year suspension from the practice of law without a fitness requirement. The Board also recommends that a 2003 reciprocal disciplinary referral, based upon the revocation of respondent’s Virginia license to practice law, be dismissed.

On November 20, 2000, respondent, Gene Belardi, entered a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to three counts of making false statements to a government agency.1 Respondent reported his convictions *225to this court and he was suspended on an interim basis on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re PerrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re CerroniDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In Re RigasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. In re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. In re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. In re Yoshihiro SaitoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API