Legal Opinion

In re Yoshihiro Saito

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2014No. 13-BG-1401Published

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary matter, Hearing Committee Number Eight (“Committee”) recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 12.1. Respondent, Yoshihiro Saito, admits to violating District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(c) (“engaging] in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation”). This violation stems from his representation of an international client and submission of a questionnaire to the United States Department of Commerce. Specifically, respondent failed to disclose significant alterations to a sales…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. In Re CerroniDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In re BelardiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API