Legal Opinion
In Re Cerroni
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 3, 1996No. 93-BG-1673, 95-BG-1407PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that Joseph Cerroni be suspended for one year, with no requirement of demonstration of fitness prior to reinstatement, but with reinstatement conditioned on completion of certain Continuing Legal Education courses. This recommendation was based on the findings of a Hearing Committee, which concluded that respondent had violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Rules 8.4(b) & (c) of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. We adopt the Board’s recommendation and suspend respondent for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re PerrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re KrounerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re RigasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.