Legal Opinion

Jones v. Keystone Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1987No. 439PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This class action for post-mortem work loss benefits under Pennsylvania’s No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act 1 was commenced by Ruth Jones, the administratrix of the estate of Michael Selden, deceased, on behalf of her decedent’s estate and the estates of all insureds of Keystone Insurance Company who had died in motor vehicle accidents after passage of the No-fault Act. The trial court held that the claim for work loss benefits asserted by Jones on behalf of her decedent’s estate had been waived. Therefore, the court entered summary judgment against Jones and dismissed the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Rybas v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McCain v. PennbankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Grant v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Carns v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Kroen v. Bedway Security Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Ackler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API