Legal Opinion

Ackler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1988No. 3196, 3197PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether an employee knew, or should have known that he had an injury and that the injury was caused by another party’s conduct, when he filed an “Employee’s Claim Petition” under oath or affirmation alleging that he had asbestosis. The petition was filed by his lawyer with the Workmen’s Compensation Board of New Jersey and stated that from May, 1980 through November 7, 1980 the appellant, Philip J. Ackler, was employed by Brand Industries and worked at the Atlantic Refinery in Philadelphia. The petition further alleged that he was suffering with…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wyatt v. A-Best, CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mest v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Debiec v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API