Legal Opinion

McCain v. Pennbank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1988No. 01516PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether the court below erred in granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Pennbank, the appellee herein. The plaintiffs below are the appellants in this court.

The basic facts are not in dispute. In March, 1986, Thomas B. McCain, one of the appellants, applied to Penn-bank for refinancing on his home mortgage. The original mortgage had been granted by Pennbank. Mr. McCain completed an application form and was told by the branch manager that he foresaw no problem in obtaining refinancing in the amount of $21,000.00. Copies of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Buczek v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Gruenwald v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Hoffman v. Brandywine HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Dansak v. Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API