Legal Opinion

Carns v. Yingling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1991No. 1495PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants as the cause of action in the case sub judice is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. At the close of pleadings in this case, defendants moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted that motion. This timely appeal followed.

On appeal, Ronald and Jacqueline Cams, plaintiffs herein, argue that the trial court applied the wrong test in determining whether the discovery rule tolled the statute of limitations in this action. Alternatively, the Carnses argue that regardless of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Levenson v. SouserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Wilson v. El-DaiefSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Ingenito v. AC & S, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Myszkowski v. Penn Stroud Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. White v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API