Legal Opinion

Tulsa County Drainage Dist. No. 12 v. Stroud

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1947No. 32500PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

On March 4, 1944, plaintiff, Tulsa county drainage district No. 12, instituted a condemnation proceeding in the district court of Tulsa county seeking to condemn a right of way for a drainage ditch in the nature of a perpetual easement across the south 80 feet of a tract of land belonging to the defendant, Melton L. Stroud. Defendant, after commissioners had been appointed and made an award of $360, demanded a jury trial, which was duly had, and a verdict rendered for defendant for $2,500. The trial court approved the verdict and rendered judgment for defendant accordingly, and plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. PriestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Ardmore v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. RobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Driver v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. BassCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API