State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Robb
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
This appeal, by the State of Oklahoma, involves a jury verdict in the amount of $328,901.68, and the district court’s judgment against the state, based thereon, in a condemnation proceeding in which both sides demanded a jury trial. In that proceeding, the state, as plaintiff, condemned, for highway purposes, a portion only of a tract of land owned by the defendants in error in the City of Tulsa and upon which they then were, and for several years prior thereto had been, operating a “drive-in” motion picture theater.
The state presents only one proposition: “Evidence of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Miller v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.