Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Robb

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1969No. 41840PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

This appeal, by the State of Oklahoma, involves a jury verdict in the amount of $328,901.68, and the district court’s judgment against the state, based thereon, in a condemnation proceeding in which both sides demanded a jury trial. In that proceeding, the state, as plaintiff, condemned, for highway purposes, a portion only of a tract of land owned by the defendants in error in the City of Tulsa and upon which they then were, and for several years prior thereto had been, operating a “drive-in” motion picture theater.

The state presents only one proposition: “Evidence of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Miller v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API