Legal Opinion
Finley v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 8, 1955No. 36633PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.
This action was commenced by the Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Robert W. Finley and others, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to condemn .22 acres of land for highway and road purposes. Defendants are the owners of the Rail Fence Tourist Court located south of Oklahoma City on the west side of U. S. Highway 77, and the .22 acres of land involved in this proceeding is a strip of land across the front of the property on which the Rail Fence Tourist Court is located. Some time after the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- State Ex Rel. McCaskill v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Grand River Dam Authority v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- H. & H. Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. CableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.