Legal Opinion

Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. Priest

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 6420PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Sequoyah County ; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Condemnation proceedings by the Incorporated Town of Sallisaw, Okla., against John F. Priest. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HAYSON, O.

This was a proceeding instituted by the incorporated town of Sallisaw, Okla., to condemn certain land for the purpose of locating the septic tank and disposal plant for its sewer system; said land being owned by John E. Priest defendant in error. Prom the appraisement made by the commissioners appointed by the court to appraise the land John F. Priest, defendant in error, filed his objections, and demanded a trial by jury for the purpose of assessing the damages to his property. The cause came on for trial in the district court of Sequoyah county, and tlie jury returned a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Idaho-Western Railway Co. v. Columbia Conference of Evangelical Lutheran Augustana SynodIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. McLaughlin v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Grand River Dam Authority v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Ardmore v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Cities Service Gas Co. v. HuebnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API