Legal Opinion

Driver v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1959No. 38092PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, hereafter referred to as “Turnpike Authority”, brought this action in condemnation against C. M. Driver and Jewel Driver, husband and wife, hereafter referred to as “defendants”, to condemn for turnpike purposes 12.6S acres of defendants’ 168-acre dairy farm lying in Rogers County, Oklahoma.

The trial court appointed commissioners to fix damages resulting to defendants’ dairy farm from Turnpike Authority taking 12.68. acres thereof. The commissioners fixed defendants’ damages at $19,000. Turnpike Authority and defendants each asked for a jury trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Grand River Dam Authority v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Arkansas Valley & Western Railway Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Oil Fields & Santa Fe R. Co. v. Treese Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Davis Oil Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. RobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API