Legal Opinion

DeRousseau v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

On appeal the defendant contends that as a matter of law the excessive speed of the train, which was traveling eighty to ninety miles an hour, was not a cause of the accident. The jury found that such speed was causal and the trial court has upheld that finding. Ruling on motions after verdict, he said:

“The engineer testified that when he was approaching two hundred feet east of the crossing he saw the lights of the truck approaching from the south along the highway. He fixed the distance of the truck from the south track at seventy-five feet when he first observed it, and its speed at twenty…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hall v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Green v. Ashland Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Waitkus v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Clemons v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fields v. CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. McGaw v. WassmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Klein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Carr v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API