Carr v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Trial was to a jury which found the railway causally negligent as to speed and not negligent as to lookout or management and control; and found Mrs. Carr causally negligent as to management and control of the automobile and not negligent as to lookout or listening or failure to heed the warning devices. Examination of the record discloses evidence to sustain the respective findings of negligence.
The appellant Railway Company submits that speed, by itself, cannot be the cause of an accident. The statement is supported by many of our decisions and as a proposition of law may be conceded, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bellrichard v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- DeRousseau v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Hammer v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Fiedler v. KapsaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. SipeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Winge v. Minnesota Transfer Railway CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Lang v. RogneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Jankovich v. ArensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Krueger v. WintersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.