Fields v. Creek
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
1. The Negligence of the Plaintiff.
Although there were two dissents, the jury found that the plaintiff was free from negligence. We have said that a finding will not be disturbed “ ‘if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury’s finding.’ ” Bleyer v. Gross (1963), 19 Wis. (2d) 305, 307, 120 N. W. (2d) 156; Van Galder v. Snyder (1948), 254 Wis. 120, 123, 35 N. W. (2d) 187. Our examination of the record compels the conclusion that there is credible evidence to support a finding that there was no negligence on the part of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Bleyer v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Roeske v. SchmittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Pecor v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Van Galder v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fahrenberg v. TengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Lievrouw v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Herro v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Weeden v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.