Klein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Since the order appealed from granted a mistrial only after the verdict had been returned by the jury, we deem it in substance to be an order granting a new trial for prejudicial remarks of counsel made during the course of argument to the jury. In so holding we do not wish to imply any criticism of the trial court; instead, it is to be commended for withholding its ruling on the motion for mistrial, since the trial had progressed to the point where all the evidence was in, until the jury returned its verdict.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Roeske v. SchmittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Georgeson v. NielsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Lehner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Laue v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Smith v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Wagner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Pieper v. Neuendorf Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Davis v. SamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.