Legal Opinion

Kink v. Combs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1965PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

In the opening statement to the jury Mr. McManus, trial counsel for the plaintiffs, stated:

“The testimony will be that . . . Mrs. Kink felt ... a hard object which she will testify in her opinion was a sexual organ . . . that she was covered with saliva and subsequent ly that upon this black dress, which we shall enter into evidence, she will testify that semen stains were ejected upon this dress by Mr. Combs, who had his physical organ exposed.”

In fact, however, Mrs. Kink did not testify that the hard object was a sexual organ or that semen stains were ejected upon the dress. The defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bethke v. DuweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Luther v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Brown v. MaxeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API