Legal Opinion

Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 3, 1993No. 14707PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, an “as is” clause in a contract conveying real property precludes a transferee from prevailing on either a private right of action or a special defense based on a transferor’s noncompliance with pretransfer disclosure regulations. The plaintiff, Holly Hill Holdings, brought this foreclosure action against the defendants, George D. Lowman, A1 Aydagul and Klaus W. H. Beckmann,1 grounded on Beckmann’s default on a note and mortgage securing property that the plaintiff had conveyed to the defendants.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Century Display Manufacturing Corp. v. D. R. Wager Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Diamond v. MarcinekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Warner v. PandolfoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Holly Hill Holdings v. LowmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Gibson v. CapanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API