Warner v. Pandolfo

On this appeal the defendant claims errors in various rulings on evidence, in the charge, mainly with reference to the proper measure of damages and the instruction that a fraudulent representation concerning property sold gives rise to a cause of action even when the property is sold “as is,” and in the failure to set aside the verdict.

The claims of error in the rulings on evidence are without merit. The defendant made no requests to charge and took no exception to the charge as given. Consequently, we are not bound to consider any of the assignments of error directed at the *729charge. Practice…