Legal Opinion
Diamond v. Marcinek
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 1993No. 14572PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether unused underground gasoline storage tanks constitute an “existing facility” for the purpose of the disclosure requirement of § 22a-449 (d)-l (f) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies.1 The plaintiff, James B. Diamond, brought this action for rescission and restitution against the defendants, George Marcinek and Leona Marcinek, grounded on the defendants’ nondisclosure of the presence of unused underground gasoline storage tanks on property that they conveyed to the plaintiff. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Hospital Ass'n v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Chrysler Corp. v. MaioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Atwood v. Regional School District No. 15Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holly Hill Holdings v. LowmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Andersen Consulting, LLP v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Vitti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Murphy v. Zoning Bd. of Review of Town of South KingstownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.