Legal Opinion
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 31, 2007No. 94-522CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY IN PART
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Currently before the Court in this Winstar litigation are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on liability. At issue is *265whether a contract was formed and, if so, whether the risk of regulatory change was shifted to Plaintiff.1
For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that a contract was formed permitting First Annapolis to count supervisory goodwill toward reduced capital requirements for a period of five years and that the risk of regulatory change did not shift to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- The Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.