Legal Opinion
Rogers v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 28, 2010No. Nos. 07-273L, 07-426L, 08-198LPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In these consolidated “rails-to-trails” actions, Plaintiffs claim that the Government effected a taking of their properties when it converted an inactive railroad right-of-way stretching from Sarasota to Venice, Florida, to a recreational trail, pursuant to the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983 (“Trails Act”). This is the Court’s second opinion addressing the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment on liability. On November 23, 2009, the Court granted, in part, Plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment in the Rogers (No. 07-273)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Stephen J. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.