Legal Opinion

Sheffler Merchandise Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 31, 1947No. C. D. 1043Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

It is the contention of the plaintiff that certain articles invoiced as “celluloid thumb tacks” were improperly classified by the collector of customs as dutiable at the rate of 4% cents per pound under the provision in paragraph 331 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “thumb tacks, of two or more pieces of iron or steel, finished or unfinished.” . The claim relied upon by plaintiff is that the articles *49are properly dutiable at nine-tenths of 1 cent per pound under the provision in said paragraph for “tacks * * * not specially provided for.” Both rates represent an increase over…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API