Sheffler Merchandise Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
It is the contention of the plaintiff that certain articles invoiced as “celluloid thumb tacks” were improperly classified by the collector of customs as dutiable at the rate of 4% cents per pound under the provision in paragraph 331 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “thumb tacks, of two or more pieces of iron or steel, finished or unfinished.” . The claim relied upon by plaintiff is that the articles *49are properly dutiable at nine-tenths of 1 cent per pound under the provision in said paragraph for “tacks * * * not specially provided for.” Both rates represent an increase over…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.