Haig v. Ohio State Board of Education

This case presents three issues: (1) whether the state board was a proper party to the R.C. Chapter 119 appeal, (2) whether declaratory and injunctive relief was appropriate, and (3) whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over the state board’s appeal. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and hold that (1) the state board was not a proper party, (2) declaratory and injunctive relief was *509not available to the parents, and (3) the court of appeals had jurisdiction over the appeal.

I

Proper Party

The parents contend that the state board is a proper…