Legal Opinion

Swander Ditch Landowners' Ass'n v. Joint Board of Huron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1990No. 88-2014PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The first question presented is whether a notice of right *133to appeal from an order made pursuant to R.C. 1515.24 must be served upon a party’s attorney of record before the thirty-day statute of limitations period provided therein commences to run.

The party’s right to appeal from a decision of the board of county commissioners is provided in R.C. 1515.24, which states in part:

“* * * Upon hearing the objectors the board may amend and shall approve the final schedule of assessments by journal entry.
“Any owner whose objection is not allowed may appeal within thirty days to the court of common…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Radaszewski v. KeatingOhio Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Haig v. Ohio State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. T & M Machines, L.L.C. v. Atty. Gen.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Aust v. Ohio State Dental BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Sautter v. GreyOhio Supreme Court · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API