Legal Opinion

Gannon v. Perk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1976No. Nos. 75-247 and 75-248PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per. Curiam.

The various parties have presented numerous assignments of error in the prosecution of -the instant-appeal and cross-appeal. The propositions of law asserted to support the assignments of error so alleged will be discussed gradatim in the context of this opinion.

i.

Appellants maintain that the Court of Appeals erred, in .holding that an action in declaratory judgment seeking a declaration regarding the legality of laypffs of policemen and firemen by the city of Cleveland .máv be.instituted notwithstanding the availability of an alternative remedy by way of appeal to the civil…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Franklin County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Fraternal Order of Police, Capital City Lodge No. 9Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Jones v. Village of Chagrin FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API