Legal Opinion
O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 1, 1994No. 12118PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The plaintiff, Daryl O’Rourke, appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his appeal from the order issued by the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles suspending the plaintiffs driver’s license *502for one year pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b.1 The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly *503(1) applied the clearly erroneous standard in reviewing the defendant’s order, and (2) concluded that there was sufficient evidence in the record to find that the plaintiff was operating the motor vehicle. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are pertinent to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. BurakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Kirei v. HadleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Kolakowski v. HadleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Paquette v. HadleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.