Legal Opinion
Kolakowski v. Hadley
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 3, 1996No. 14909PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiff, Chester Kolakowski, appealed to the Superior Court from the suspension of his motor vehicle operator’s license by the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b,1 the implied consent *638statute. The trial court sustained the plaintiffs appeal. On appeal to this court, the commissioner claims that the trial court improperly sustained the plaintiffs appeal because there is substantial evidence to support the commissioner’s decision to suspend the plaintiffs *639operator’s license. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clynch v. ChapmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Van ZuilenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Pizzo v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.