Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Rogers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabKSON, J.
The plaintiff in its petition to condemn the land of defendants alleges: “That in order to construct, maintain, and use its electric transmission line, it is necessary for petitioner to acquire from defendants a right of way or easement over, through, and across the above-described tract of land the following-described parcel of land, to wit: Being a strip of land 100 feet in width, extending across a portion of the tracts of land hereinbefore described for a distance of 1,262 feet, said strip of land 100 feet in width having heretofore been staked out and laid off by petitioner.”
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Railroad v. Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Western Carolina Power Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Colvard v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Crisp v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- City of Charlotte v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.