Legal Opinion

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabKSON, J.

The plaintiff in its petition to condemn the land of defendants alleges: “That in order to construct, maintain, and use its electric transmission line, it is necessary for petitioner to acquire from defendants a right of way or easement over, through, and across the above-described tract of land the following-described parcel of land, to wit: Being a strip of land 100 feet in width, extending across a portion of the tracts of land hereinbefore described for a distance of 1,262 feet, said strip of land 100 feet in width having heretofore been staked out and laid off by petitioner.”

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Railroad v. Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Western Carolina Power Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Colvard v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Crisp v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. City of Charlotte v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API