Legal Opinion

City of Charlotte v. Spratt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1965No. 286PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

In United States v. Grizzard, 219 U.S. 180, 31 S. Ct. 162, 55 L. Ed. 165, 31 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1135, Mr. Justice Lurton said: “Whenever there has been an actual physical taking of a part of a distinct tract of land, the compensation to be awarded includes not only the market value of that part of the tract appropriated, but the damage to the remainder resulting from that taking, embracing, of course, injury due to the use to which the part appropriated is to be devoted.” (Our italics). This excerpt from Mr. Justice Lurton’s opinion has been quoted with approval by this Court: Power Co. v. Hayes,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. City of Oakland v. NutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Hoyle v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API