Legal Opinion

Colvard v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKSON, J.

The transmission line of defendant was constructed a distance of 2,792 feet angling across plaintiff’s 84%-acre tract and 197 feet across his 2.09-acre tract. There are 12 poles and one brace pole on the land. The power cables sag down and are about 15 to 21 feet from the ground and carries 66,000 voltage. The plaintiff testified in part unobjected to :

“The transmission is constructed on poles set about 300 feet apart on which are placed two cross or angle bars or frames on which three power cables are strung. The wires are about 8 feet wide, about four feet from the poles. . . . There are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Crisp v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Jernigan v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Carolina Power & Light Company v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API