Legal Opinion

Crisp v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

Under “Eminent Domain,” chapter 33, C. S., 1706, is the following: “The right of eminent domain may, under, the provisions of this chapter, be exercised for the purpose of constructing their roads, canals, lines of wires, or other works, which are authorized by law and which involve a public use or benefit, by the bodies politic, corporations, or persons following: . . . (3) Persons operating or desiring to operate electric light plants, for the purpose of constructing and erecting wire or other necessary things.”

Under said chapter the procedure for condemnation of land for public purposes is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Hodges v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Phillips v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Raleigh, Charlotte & Southern Railway Co. v. Mecklenburg Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Teeter v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Colvard v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Carolina Power and Light Company v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API