Legal Opinion
Sewell v. Celebrezze
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 10, 1963No. Civ. No. 818 W.DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, District Judge.
This is an action under the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. for judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary, under which he pursuant to Section 404.9551 of the regulations under the Act reversed the “inferences, findings or conclusions of the Hearing Examiner” and held the plaintiff’s old age benefits subject to deductions for November and December 1959 and for all of the months of 1960.
The only issue 2 in the case is whether or not the record reveals substantial evidence to sustain the decision that plaintiff’s old age insurance benefits for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Herbert L. Goldman, Administrator of the Estate of Esther B. Goldman v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1971
- Rufer v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1972