Legal Opinion

Rufer v. Richardson

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 25, 1972No. Civ. 71-23SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NICHOL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Lillian H. Rufer, is seeking-judicial review under 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 405(g) of a final decision of the Appeals Council of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare upholding the hearing examiner’s decision that the “Claimant has not established that she is retired within the meaning of the Social Security Act” and is, therefore, not entitled to Social Security benefits after deductions for excess earnings have been made.

Mrs. Rufer reached age 62 in March of 1962. She applied for and was granted reduced Social Security retirement insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Herbert E. BolasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Morris Newman v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Leslie A. Ludeking v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Alma M. McCalip v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API