Legal Opinion

Halbert v. Rosenbalm

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1896No. 6079PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Washington county. Tried below before Doane, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in the county court of Washington county, originally, against M. H. B. Rosenbalm of defendants, and in the petition there filed it was in substance alleged that on October 5, 1883, the defendant executed and delivered to Yilina Wild a promissory note, which was afterward, and prior to its maturity, sold by her and assigned to one Victor G-. Lantry; that at the time she sold the note she indorsed the same in blank and thereby became liable for its payment; that the note was sold and assigned on the day he purchased it, by Y. G. Lantry, to John S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Binfield v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Fuller v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schwartz v. KarlovskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shull v. BartonNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Denise v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Johns v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Riggs v. HrochNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API