Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Schroeder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Butler county. Tried below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

The plaintiffs allege in their petition “that on July 16, 1882, said plaintiff conditionally purchased of defendants a Walter A. Wood harvester and binder under an express warranty made by defendants, a copy of which warranty is hereto attached, marked ‘A/ whereby defendants warranted said machine to be made of good material, and capable of doing first-class work in cutting, binding and saving grain — that being the purpose for which said machine was intended — and that the plaintiff was to have one day in which to give said machine a fair trial, and if said machine did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. IskeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Union Pacific Railway v. OgilvyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shierman v. SheaNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Halbert v. RosenbalmNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Western Cornice & Manufacturing Works v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sturgeon v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Inglehart v. LullNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API