Legal Opinion

Johns v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1910No. 16,738PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to the district court for Seward county: George E. Corcoran, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

The plaintiff in error, upon an information charging burglary and grand larceny, was convicted in the district court for Seward county, and this action is prosecuted to review the record of that conviction. The plaintiff in error will be hereinafter referred to as the defendant.

Counsel for the defendant contend that the first count in the information does not charge a criminal offense, for the reason that the letters “ialiciously” appear in the information in place of the word “maliciously.” Section 48 of the criminal code, as amended in 1905, provides: “If any person shall wilfully,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marion v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. George v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Barney v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rema v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Sedlacek v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pribyl v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People v. ChenaultCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Holthus v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API