Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Karlovsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 11, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Wikdes, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gaby

delivered the opixioh of the Court.

The appellee sued the appellants upon two promissory notes and recovered judgment for the amount of the notes and interest.

The appellants claimed that in other dealings the amount was reduced to a fraction of the amount recovered. The question was one of fact, and we can not review the verdict:

First. Because the bill of exceptions is not a part of the record here; the stipulation being like several others in cases we have decided, of which Zielinski v. Remus, 46 Ill. App. 596, is the earliest, and Mason v. Strong, 51 Ill. App. 482, the latest.

Second.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. NilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  2. Zielinski v. RemusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  3. Mason v. StrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halbert v. RosenbalmNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Browne v. NussbaumerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  3. Hughes v. RichterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API