Legal Opinion
Shull v. Barton
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1899No. 8377PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This cause was decided at the last term, when an opinion was filed reversing the judgment below. (56 Neb. 716.) A rehearing was allowed, and a second submission taken. The facts, with sufficient clearness and fullness, are stated in the former opinion and need not be restated at this time. Certain of the legal propositions enunciated on the former hearing are assailed by counsel for plaintiffs below in language quite forcible, and not entirely courteous to this court.
It was the judgment of this court that the failure of the coroner to require the sureties on the bond given by the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Viterbo v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Ford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Legat v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- State v. CasedayOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Hanson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Public Schools v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.