Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Kellogg

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1898No. 8169PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from the district court of Phelps county. Tried below before Beall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

In tlie district court of Plielps c.ounty, in an action at law for damages, George Kellogg recovered a judgment against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. After tlie adjournment of the term of court at wliicli such judgment was rendered the railway company brought this suit for a new trial of the law action. The court.entered a judgment dismissing the action, and the railway company has filed fiere a petition in error to review this judgment.

1. The Hon. F. B. Beall was the judge who presided at tlie trial of the law case, and. he also presided at the trial of the case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Binfield v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Watts v. HollandTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Halbert v. RosenbalmNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Errissman v. ErrissmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Suarez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Roberts v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. O'Boyle v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. GoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Johns v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API