Legal Opinion

Cokley v. City of Otsego

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 2001No. C7-00-1327PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge

This is an action by a former employee of the City of Otsego for damages under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act, Minn. Stat. § 181.932 (2000). After a jury verdict in favor of the employee, the City appeals from denial of its motions for JNOV and a new trial, and the district court’s enhancement of the attorney-fee award. Because the employee did not engage in protected activity and failed to establish a causal link between her action and elimination of her position, we reverse.

FACTS

The township of Otsego was incorporated into a city in 1990. When the township’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Obst v. Microtron, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Thompson v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Andre Pope v. Esa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. May Yang v. Robert Half Int., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. David F. Freeman v. Ace Telephone Assoc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Skare v. Extendicare Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Tanya J. Fjelsta v. Zogg Dermatology, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API